Compared with online retailers, bookstores present a frustrating consumer experience. A physical store—whether it’s your favorite indie or the humongous Barnes & Noble at the mall—offers a relatively paltry selection, no customer reviews, no reliable way to find what you’re looking for, and a dubious recommendations engine. Amazon suggests books based on others you’ve read; your local store recommends what the employees like. If you don’t choose your movies based on what the guy at the box office recommends, why would you choose your books that way?

Okay, I know I’ve recommended him before, but I’m jumping of the Farhad Manjoo bandwagon. Not just because he prefers Amazon shopping to local bookstores—that’s well within the mainstream of course—but because his logic is so anti-intellectual, to use Amazon’s own M.O. to defend its impact on book culture, and paint anyone who has loyalty to a local store as a “bookstore cultist,” not say, someone who likes to (even symbolically) have one’s sales tax contribute to a local economy.

Independent bookstores have “a paltry selection, no customer reviews…a dubious recommendation engine?” Either this is a piece of performance art in which he plays the part of a whiny 12-year old being dragged through a musty store, he swiped this article from an internal Amazon company memo, or maybe it’s just that tech writers for a site like Slate are always going to side with efficient capitalism and technological progress.

(via marathonpacks)

One of the weird things about tech people (and business people in general) is their collective fantasies that they a) choose well and b) spend their time efficiently. The first has been steadily debunked, the second is the secret underpinning of a lot of this thinking and needs detonation.

(Reblogged from marathonpacks)

Notes

  1. theopensea reblogged this from manzanasverdes
  2. manzanasverdes reblogged this from isabelthespy
  3. rogueish reblogged this from tomewing and added:
    Do people really buy books based...customer reviews
  4. beautravail reblogged this from marathonpacks and added:
    because it’s an...model it’s therefore...Eric’s point about...
  5. nickminichino reblogged this from marathonpacks and added:
    that! I just (mis)read a moral imperative into your comment....trying to explain
  6. marathonpacks reblogged this from nickminichino and added:
    Well, there’s making...argument about working...the current...
  7. sexshooter reblogged this from tomewing
  8. judyxberman reblogged this from katherinestasaph and added:
    I just wrote something about this that’s going to go up on Flavorwire soon, so I won’t get into the points I make there…...
  9. belufronsie reblogged this from isabelthespy
  10. katherinestasaph reblogged this from isabelthespy and added:
    Two questions, the answers to which might be obvious and/or make me look bad but still: 1) What about things you really...
  11. tumblingforth reblogged this from isabelthespy
  12. isabelthespy reblogged this from cureforbedbugs
  13. cureforbedbugs reblogged this from marathonpacks and added:
    Matt Yglesias : Slate :: Krugman : NYT op-ed section
  14. mactra reblogged this from marathonpacks and added:
    Eric has had it with Farhad, saying “maybe it’s just that tech writers for a site like Slate are always going to side...
  15. tomewing reblogged this from marathonpacks
  16. lastbutnotleast reblogged this from marathonpacks
  17. mathrockets reblogged this from marathonpacks
  18. speakingintongues said: Jesus it’s a wonder anyone bought books at all prior to like 2000.
  19. choire said: I KNOW.
  20. marathonpacks posted this