abbyjean: very small array Fun, though they should have used %ages rather than raw numbers. But what this doesn’t take into account really is the way in which “alternative” has shifted, softened, become more electronic or beat-driven over the years. I suspect a lot of 2009 ‘alternative’ might not have been classified that way in 2003. View high resolution

abbyjean:

very small array

Fun, though they should have used %ages rather than raw numbers. But what this doesn’t take into account really is the way in which “alternative” has shifted, softened, become more electronic or beat-driven over the years. I suspect a lot of 2009 ‘alternative’ might not have been classified that way in 2003.

(Reblogged from abbyjean)

Notes

  1. richaod reblogged this from tomewing
  2. tomewing reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
    Fun, though they should have used %ages rather than raw numbers. But what this doesn’t take into account really is the...
  3. abbyjean posted this